It really is remarkable how atheists, at least the one’s that comment here, pledge their allegiance to the scientific method of knowing and discovering. And that’s good. It’s a fine, fine model for getting answers to natural phenomena. In fact, it’s so good that we can know beyond a reasonable doubt that the Standard Big Bang Model of our universe’s origin is how it happened.
As was noted previously:
It can be said with absolute confidence that no cosmogonic model has been:
As repeatedly verified in its predictions,
As corroborated by attempts at its falsification,
As concordant with empirical discoveries, and
As philosophically coherent as the Standard Big Bang Creation Event Model.
The remarkable part of all this is that these same atheists don’t seem to want to accept this model. So the question becomes - Why? If, as atheists are fond of saying, they're rational, logical, reasonable people, and if the evidence points to the Big Bang Model, why do you reject that model and instead fancy models for which there is ONLY speculation AND for which there is concrete evidence that negates their feasibility?
Why won’t you allow yourself to accept the Big Bang Model of Creation when that's where the evidence points?