Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Maggots from Dead Garbage = No God

Atheists have been with us for a long, long time. They're still using the same old argument. Life from non life is no big deal. One even told me today that Life arising from non life is a "well understood process." Let's elect one of these guys to office shall we?

Omne vivmm ex vivo Life must come only from life. Everything in the study of the origins of life, to date (except the speculations of that lunatic Dawkins) has done nothing but confirm this axiom.

10 comments:

Hugo said...

"One even told me today that Life arising from non life is a well understood process."

YES, HE IS RIGHT
Welcome to the 21st century...

Want to learn about it? or perhaps you're afraid to realize how wrong you are?

And you know what's ironic, again? it's that you mention Dawkins, who is in the biology field, which has barely anything to do with Abiogenesis Theory as biology starts when there is life, not before. Before life, you are in the real of chemistry...

Too technical for you again Rod?

Still waiting for the science quiz answer... Do you agree with Young Earth Creationists who say that it's possible for the Earth to be between 6,000 and 10,000 years old? Would you leave the door open to such hypothesis?

Gorth Satana said...

Life is chemical.

Hugo said...

Life is chemical.

Is that a very short summary? lol

SmartLX said...

Linking back to Mak's comment in "Atheists Ignore Science", he thinks that "scientific naturalists demand that NOTHING can be believed without consistent observation and verification". Here he is railing against scientific naturalists who accept the probable reality of abiogenesis without ever having observed or fully reproduced it.

His concept of the positions of scientific naturalists has about as much continuity as Firefly fan-fiction by five different authors.

The Atheist Missionary said...

We don't come into this world - we come out of this world: Alan Watts.

Makarios said...

so carbon dioxide and nitrogen are living gases that, oh yes, just like Dawkins said, and now chemists are also apparently saying, THEY EVOLVED. They self replicated. You guys are a hoot.

Gorth Satana said...

Maybe it's me but I can't understand your last comment.

Is it a reference to Miller-Urey?

Hugo said...

I guess it's safe to call an argument a "strawman argument" when the people you argue with do not even know what you are talking about...

Why are you talking about Dawkins again? Did he ever contribute to the Abiogenesis Theory? I doubt it. At the very best he can talk about it, just like any other scientist...

Makarios said...

Why are you talking about Dawkins again? Did he ever contribute to the Abiogenesis Theory?"

He certainly thinks he does. Are you telling me that chemists in the field of origins / abiogenesis are handing out the 'well understood process' whereby carbon dioxide and nitrogen evolved into self-replicating cells?

Hugo said...

Hey MAKARIOS and OTHERS,

I decided that it was finally time for me to have my own blog.

Actually, I already had created one a few days ago because I wanted to share a little sketch with someone.

One user who writes here, "His Lordship", noticed my sketch and thought I should show it to you Makarios, so why not? It's related to your misconception of what infinity or the Big Bang truly represent.

At the same time, it made me realize that I could spend some time, once in a while, to write something on that temporary blog I had already created... so I decided to put my Abiogenesis reply as my first real blog post!

Just click on my username or browse to http://hugo-temp.blogspot.com to find out.

Cheers!