Ah, what a challenge. I’ve spent the last week or so looking at the problem of -
“What is the origin of the required information needed to build the first living organism?”
Here’s what atheists had to say in this “discussion.” All of them are direct quotes. To protect the dull of mind and slow of thought, I've not indicated who made these statements.
I really wish you would address the logical conundrum of God's genesis.
What model of information theory do you accept?
Makarios, what information theory model do you accept?
What is the cause of God? There is none, thereby negating your entire basis for believing the universe must have required a cause - a sentient cause at that.
I think this is the last time I respond to anything you write about evolution or abiogenesis until you address one of these two things:
1. The origin God
2. The Biblical account of creation
The big bang created time so there is no such thing as before the big bang so therefore the universe has always existed. Would you accept this as valid?
Firmament, firmament, firmanent... wherefore art thou firmament.
Yeah Chris :) ... "nevermind" ...Is that some actual code word for mindless?
Bible boy Mak claims that he has all the answers and they can be found in a book written between 3500-1800 years ago.
He also has a hard time explaining why he is an atheist towards all other gods but his own.
Right down to Noah and the ark and the animals marching in rows of two.
A rather long argument from personal incredulity.
ATHEISM IS JUST A LACK OF BELIEF IN GODS.
No Christian wants to defend the Bible, and I can't say I blame them.
they find amino acids on comets
My absolute favourite is this one. This whole series had to do with “How did the DNA code originate?” and this priceless beauty arose from the discussion.
"A cell is a product of a chemical code, and it acts on chemical signals. There is no "design" to it at all, it is merely a manifestation of an execution of its code."