tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4764946987133813099.post1400699134234069083..comments2024-01-29T01:22:14.621-08:00Comments on Makarios: Atheists and FaithThesauroshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13305052511095551483noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4764946987133813099.post-82204029731393850072009-11-28T20:22:25.610-08:002009-11-28T20:22:25.610-08:00"draughtsmanship of crabs." not draughts..."draughtsmanship of crabs." not draughtsmanship in general.Chris Mackeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05959441215025867286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4764946987133813099.post-47328009893995218392009-11-28T20:20:47.692-08:002009-11-28T20:20:47.692-08:00I'm back.
Looked at the index, Haeckel is in...I'm back. <br /><br />Looked at the index, Haeckel is in there twice.<br />(Paraphrased from memory)<br />Dawkins says he admires Haeckel's draughtsmanship.<br /><br />There is some drawings of crabs by Haeckel.<br /><br />No embyro drawings by Haeckel.<br />There are photographs of embryos.Chris Mackeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05959441215025867286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4764946987133813099.post-18768906396726789692009-11-28T19:08:35.407-08:002009-11-28T19:08:35.407-08:00Do you know if it's true that Haeckel's dr...<i>Do you know if it's true that Haeckel's drawings are in fact in Dawkins latest book</i>?<br /><br />I'm about to go into town. If I spot the book, I'll flip through it and have a look.Chris Mackeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05959441215025867286noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4764946987133813099.post-442310010594566142009-11-28T18:54:49.308-08:002009-11-28T18:54:49.308-08:00Thanks for the link. I'd never heard of Wells ...Thanks for the link. I'd never heard of Wells which I suppose is some sort of sin. I haven't read it all yet but I will. <br /><br />I found this quote interesting and it leads me to ask. Do you know if it's true that Haeckel's drawings are in fact in Dawkins latest book?<br /><br />"In the interests of forthrightness, one point must be conceded straight out: Haeckel's embryo drawings have no place in textbooks except as an example of how erroneous ideas can get tacked onto important truths and perpetuated even after being debunked (Haeckel's inaccurate drawings have actually been 'exposed' multiple times since the 1800's,"Thesauroshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13305052511095551483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4764946987133813099.post-41955400065168412372009-11-28T17:54:21.880-08:002009-11-28T17:54:21.880-08:00Here's a link that answers all the things you ...Here's a <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/iconob.html" rel="nofollow">link</a> that answers all the things you say have been discredited.<br /><br />SCIENCE WORKS.Chris Mackeyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05959441215025867286noreply@blogger.com